requestId:684c3e16dcd1e6.28870155.
Historical and political science in the science perspective: referenced by historical social science, political history, and comparative politics
Author: Yao Zhongqiu
Source: Author authorized by Confucian networkBaoqiang.com, original “Politics Research” No. 1, 2020
Time: Confucius was in the 2570s, March 24th of the Gengzi, Ji Chou
� href=”https://twsugarhug.org/”>ConsumingThe new paradigm, but of course it does not start from scratch, but there are many useful knowledge resources. This article explores its relationship with historical and political science. Historical politics and historical society strive to bring back history and the country, and share many ways; but the latter has prejudice between the Eastern Middle and pursues value-free principles, and only understands or explains; historical politics eliminates the Eastern Middle and treats the political reality of non-Eastern countries, and has clear value-added, and strives to explore the way of good governance from history. Historical politics calls on history to refocus political history and make it political imagination. Historical politics can lead to a large historical perspective for comparative politics, and correct its deviation based on the Western-style political system.
Keywords: Historical Politics Historical Society Political History Comparative Politics Methods Discussion
ChinaLong-term NursingThe Department of Political Science in the National People’s Political Science in mid-2019 issued an initiative to develop historical politics, which aroused widespread opposition in the academic community. There is also confusion: the international academic community has a mature historical social science and historical systemic paradigm. Including the political community, domestic scholars have the ability to develop historical social science. Why should we further raise historical politics?
In an article in 2013, the author discussed the historical and political science based on China’s super-regulated modeling recommendations, but whether this concept can be widely advocated, Yang Guangbin and the author discussed it again, and had been hesitant. Finally, I will meet the diverse Zhu Yunhan to give a final word. From the perspective of academic development, there are at most three points to propose historical politics:
First, it clearly serves the development of political science. From the perspective of science, in the context of social science, politics can borrow its research results, but it is regarded as a branch or research path of politics, and it will eventually lead to incorrect names and poor words and difficult things. Historical politics clearly defines its political science subjects and are legitimate, which is conducive to promoting the development of political science.
Second, explore new ways for the development of Chinese political science. For more than 100 years, China’s academic political studies have been an important force in academic development by introducing and transplanting foreign theoretical theories such as Japan, Su, Britain and the United States. In the midst of the great changes in the modern world, the European american family has been widely experiencing political decline, which has also caused its political management theft to lose its influence on academic and morality. China has already had enough political self-reliance and began to seek self-reliance in political management theft. For two reasons, please ask Chinese political science to conduct theoretical development, and rebuild the focus concept, basic subject and foundation logic of political science. But where is the breakthrough? Original theory can only come from facing the facts directly, and the first sentence of the preface to the preface of the law defines China as follows: “China is one of the longest-standing countries in the world.” China has a long national history, so it has rich political experience, which is a precious resource for theoretical creation in Chinese politics. At the same time, China has a long and rich academic tradition of history and a practical historical politics. Therefore, the transformation of Chinese political science into history is determined by the internal properties of the country and civilization and its own academic tradition. If you develop along this paradigm, you will be able to achieve great results.
Third, establish the independence of Chinese academics. Historical and social science was first established in Europe and was prosperous in american after the mid-20th century. Chinese scholars are only later consumers in this paradigm, and can only explain Chinese facts with their unmethod, logical, and theoretical knowledge, and they have little original academic contribution. Historical politics is a new paradigm. Chinese scholars took the lead in proposing it and constructed their research leaders from the bottom. The academic nature is self-evident. At the same time, when the existing political paradigm is deteriorating, it is a wide choice to turn to history. Therefore, the development of historical politics not only does not benefit the development of Chinese politics, but can even promote the paradigm transformation of world politics; considering the key position of politics in the modern social science system can also promote the paradigm transformation in other social science fields.
After rectifying the name of historical politics, we each thought about it, wrote and published several articles, and made a preliminary discussion on the research and development of historical politics. In this process, I deeply realized that there is a need to determine the relationship between historical politics and historical society. This article will discuss the similarity and differences between the two. At the same time, the major in political history in the two subjects of history and politics also has two dimensions: history and politics, which are inherently related to historical politics; historical politics also widely applies comparative historical analysis methods, which are closely related to comparative political science. Therefore, this article will also briefly discuss the relationship between historical politics and political history and comparative political science. It is necessary to explain that the differences are revealed not to establish a school, but to better understand themselves: to use the others as reference, and to accurately understand history and politics.Academic orientation and approach of learning.
1. The similarity between historical politics and historical society
Discussing the differences between historical politics and historical society, immediately touch on a question: What kind of historical society? When social sciences began to rise in Europe, they were influenced by the historical sciences that occupied the place of arrangement at that time, and were under pressure from the initial enthusiasm for the realism of the proof of the net. They naturally adhered to the historical orientation and presented the historical social landscape. Karl Marx and Max Vebert (Max) Weber, Emile Durkheim and other three social founders, especially the first two, settled in historical construction to build their theory, thus laying the foundation for the historical social paradigm. In the past two hundred years, history and society have been through several stages. The evolution of the study has formed a variety of research and development orientations. This article only focuses on historical and social studies closely related to political science.
In detail, this article refers to the choices of two political scholars and plans the scope of historical society to be discussed: Yang Guangbin listed four main branches of historical society: the “Moor School”, an important figure is the Barrington Moore, who promoted the historical society to rise in the 1960s of the 20th century, and made it excited; there are also the “Tile School” and Michael Mann’s social theory and the world system theory created by Wallerstein and others. Yang Guangbin concluded: “Historical and social science is a discussion on the history of modern countries. In the process of discussing the formation of modern countries, serious discussions such as political paths of modern countries, level relations, reactions, civilians, and ethnic groups are summarized. 官网彩官网 topic. “These studies are obviously closely related to politics, so Yang Guangbin listed him as a “temporary knowledge resource for political theory.” Guo Tai visited 15 European and American historical socialists and pointed out their cooperation points: “They turned to history, focusing on reaction, social conflict and change, industrialization, level structure, national structure, civil dominance, capitalism source and change, authority system, etc., and created a macro-contrast-平台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台台�re.org/”>官网New Trends.” These are the main topics of political science, namely historical social science or “standard historical politics” with political attributes.
There is indeed a c
發佈留言